FAST CAPITAL TRUE COST STRUCTURED ADVISORY

What Fast Capital Really Costs — And Why Cheap Capital Is Often the Most Expensive

In periods of tightened liquidity, the demand for “fast capital” increases.

Sponsors facing acquisition deadlines, refinancing maturities, or liquidity pressure often prioritize speed over structure. Bridge lenders, private credit funds, and opportunistic capital providers step in to meet that demand.

Speed has value.

But speed has cost.

The mistake many operators make is assuming that cost is limited to the interest rate quoted on the term sheet.

It rarely is.

The Illusion of the Rate

When sponsors evaluate bridge or short-term capital, conversations frequently center on:

rn
• rn

  Stated interest rate

  rn
rn
• rn

  Origination points

  rn
rn
• rn

  Exit flexibility

  rn
rn
• rn

  Prepayment penalties

  rn
rn

What is often overlooked is structural cost.

Structural cost includes:

rn
• rn

  Aggressive covenants

  rn
rn
• rn

  Default triggers

  rn
rn
• rn

  Extension pricing

  rn
rn
• rn

  Fee stacking

  rn
rn
• rn

  Required reserves

  rn
rn
• rn

  Cash flow sweeps

  rn
rn
• rn

  Equity participation

  rn
rn
• rn

  Refinancing pressure timelines

  rn
rn

A loan priced at 11% may ultimately cost more than a loan priced at 13% depending on structure.

Cheap capital is not defined by rate.

It is defined by total capital stack impact.

Urgency Compresses Leverage

Fast capital providers understand timing pressure.

When capital is sought 30–60 days before a closing event, negotiating leverage narrows. Terms harden. Flexibility decreases.

In urgent scenarios, sponsors may accept:

rn
• rn

  High exit fees

  rn
rn
• rn

  Opaque extension clauses

  rn
rn
• rn

  Mandatory refinance windows

  rn
rn
• rn

  Equity kickers disguised as fee alignment

  rn
rn

The urgency premium is not reflected solely in interest.

It is embedded in structure.

Preparation widens optionality.

Urgency compresses it.

The Hidden Cost of Short-Term Thinking

Bridge capital is not inherently problematic.

It is often necessary.

The problem arises when short-term capital is layered onto a business plan that has not been stress-tested.

Sponsors who fail to model:

rn
• rn

  Stabilization timeline risk

  rn
rn
• rn

  Valuation sensitivity

  rn
rn
• rn

  Refinance capacity at conservative rates

  rn
rn
• rn

  Capital market tightening scenarios

  rn
rn

Expose themselves to rollover risk.

That rollover risk is where “cheap” capital becomes expensive.

When refinance assumptions fail, sponsors may face:

rn
• rn

  Forced recapitalization

  rn
rn
• rn

  Equity dilution

  rn
rn
• rn

  Additional mezzanine layering

  rn
rn
• rn

  Asset sales under pressure

  rn
rn
• rn

  Sponsor control erosion

  rn
rn

At that point, cost is no longer measured in basis points.

It is measured in ownership.

Structured Capital vs. Fast Capital

There is a distinction between securing capital quickly and structuring capital correctly.

Structured capital advisory evaluates:

rn
• rn

  Full capital stack durability

  rn
rn
• rn

  Multiple refinance pathways

  rn
rn
• rn

  Exit optionality

  rn
rn
• rn

  Downside protection

  rn
rn
• rn

  Cash flow resilience

  rn
rn
• rn

  Equity preservation

  rn
rn

Fast capital focuses on time to close.

Structured capital focuses on total transaction outcome.

They are not mutually exclusive — but one must guide the other.

When Speed Is Appropriate

There are scenarios where fast capital is strategically correct:

rn
• rn

  Time-sensitive acquisitions with strong downside protection

  rn
rn
• rn

  Opportunistic portfolio expansions

  rn
rn
• rn

  Bridge-to-stabilization underwritten with discipline

  rn
rn
• rn

  Strategic recapitalizations with defined refinance paths

  rn
rn

In these cases, speed is aligned with preparation.

The risk lies in speed without structure.

The Institutional Lens

Institutional counterparties evaluate capital durability, not just pricing.

Private credit, banks, and alternative lenders increasingly scrutinize:

rn
• rn

  Sponsor track record

  rn
rn
• rn

  Business model resilience

  rn
rn
• rn

  Coverage ratios under stress

  rn
rn
• rn

  Asset liquidity

  rn
rn
• rn

  Capital stack layering

  rn
rn

Sponsors who rely on cheap short-term capital without forward structure risk being viewed as opportunistic rather than disciplined.

Markets reward discipline.

They penalize fragility.

The Real Cost Calculation

When evaluating fast capital, the relevant question is not:

“What is the rate?”

It is:

“What does this structure look like if markets tighten further?”

True capital cost must consider:

rn
• rn

  Downside valuation protection

  rn
rn
• rn

  Refinance viability

  rn
rn
• rn

  Required additional equity

  rn
rn
• rn

  Extension fee stacking

  rn
rn
• rn

  Cash flow impact

  rn
rn
• rn

  Sponsor control preservation

  rn
rn

When modeled accurately, “cheap” capital often reveals embedded long-term cost.

Closing Perspective

Fast capital has a role in sophisticated transactions.

But capital should be architected — not chased.

Sponsors who prioritize full capital stack strategy consistently outperform those optimizing for speed alone.

In tightening markets, discipline compounds.

Speed without structure does not.

Don McClain
rnFounder & Principal
rnFast Commercial Capital
rnMiami | Austin | San Diego
rnNationwide Business & Commercial Real Estate Advisory